Custom Pages
[vc_separator type='transparent' color='' thickness='' up='20' down='7']
Portfolio
[vc_separator type='transparent' color='' thickness='' up='20' down='7'] [vc_separator type="transparent" position="center" up="12" down="16"]

Level-measurement Technology and Blocking Distances

Level-measurement Technology and Blocking Distances

This article discusses blocking distance and what happens when sensors become submerged. Submersion (or flooding) of the sensors can occur in some applications, so ultrasonic level measurement sensors are therefore often protected by mechanical flooding sleeves. However, such components can easily become contaminated and impair the reliability of the measurement. Radar level measurement sensors, on the other hand, have no dead zone, do not require protective sleeves, and measure reliably even in the case of submersion.

There are many containers that hold aggressive media such as acids or alkalis. Reliable measurement—right up to the antenna—is important here, such as for a chemical container filled with iron chloride, for example. The problem with ultrasonic flowmeters for such an application is that the sound transducer is a loudspeaker and microphone in one. While transmitting signals, it cannot receive any signals. This creates a blocking distance. Ultrasonic, therefore, is not necessarily suitable for applications where there is a high chance of overflowing.

Far far away, behind the word mountains, far from the countries Vokalia and Consonantia, there live the blind texts.

We do not have this problem with radar sensors. A radar sensor can simultaneously emit and receive signals. This means there is no blocking distance, and you can measure levels that reach right up to the sensor itself.

Blocking distance affects the measuring point. That means that as I get closer and closer to the water surface with the sensor, the sensor displays an error message. In my demonstration, you see the error message when I reach a distance of about 25 centimeters. This means the ultrasonic sensor cannot detect the level at this close range correctly. The worst-case scenario could even be an overfilling of the container

A radar sensor, on the other hand, measures the received signal even while it is transmitting, so it does not produce an error as it gets closer to the material. Because of this, the sensor can measure levels very close to the antenna. Even if the sensor is submerged, it still displays the maximum level. This means measurement with a radar sensor is much more reliable than with an ultrasonic device.

No Comments

Post A Comment